hello dieter, yes, i can remember the prototype you mentioned. both approaches have their own advantages. the a112 can do things which the miniwave cannot do and vice versa. i have some ideas for such a "miniwave-like" module, but we should discuss this offline first. best wishes ingo --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "Dieter Doepfer" <hardware@...> wrote: > > Ingo, > > right, we have only the A-112 module available that can be used as a > wavetable oscillator that is a bit similar to the miniwave but the > wavetables have to be loaded via Midi dump and the pitch is not controlled > by a sawtooth wave but by a normal CV. During the A-112 development we had a > prototype similar to the miniwave available. It had a fixed wavetable ROM, > the current position within each table and the active wavetable have been > addressed by 8 bit analog-to-digital converters (normally a sawtooth wave > for the current position for a linear pass through the table) and a rotary > switch was used to address 16 wave table groups (I think I have shown you > the prototype during your visit last year). But we decided to add the sample > feature and use a battery-buffered RAM instead of the fixed ROM. So the > A-112 arised from our "miniwave" design. If there are sufficient inquiries > we could revive our prototype and finish the design but from our point of > the wavetable ROMs are the main problem as everybody has different ideas > concerning the available wavetables. > > Best wishes > Dieter Doepfer > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > > Von: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com > > [mailto:Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com]Im Auftrag von selfoscillate > > Gesendet: Dienstag, 27. Juni 2006 09:21 > > An: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com > > Betreff: [Doepfer_a100] Re: Thoughts on A105 Filter (SSM2044 ) > > > > > > > > i don't think that there is a miniwave in doepfer format > > available, or do i misunderstand your question? > > > > best wishes > > > > ingo > > > > > > > > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, q v s f u e k p s v h s l w > > <izimizam@> wrote: > > > > > > Thanks for the link > > > > > > On the subject of the Minwave , how different is the Blacet and > > Doepfer versions ?anyone compared them ? and has anyone any feedback > > on the various roms available and how good they are ? > > > > > > > > > > > > ilanode <techmeier@> wrote: > > > Dave Hylander distributes them > > > http://www.hylander.com/miniwave.html > > > > > > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, q v s f u e k p s v h s l w > > > <izimizam@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > PPG waveforms for my Blacet Mini Wave. > > > > > > > > hi florian - any idea where can i source the ppg waveforms for > > > my miniwave ? > > > > > > > > Florian Anwander <Florian.Anwander@> wrote: > > > > Hi Ingo, > > > > > > > > to my opinion the A-105 ist the best "bang for the money" if you > > > are > > > > looking for a lowpass filter at Doepfer. I cannot tell why, but > > it > > > has > > > > the best sounding resonance, and it is the most musical kind of > > > > filtering. I don't know how to describe, it's like the sounds > > > jumps "to > > > > the front of a stage", like a singer of a band who comes on > > > catwalk in > > > > to the public. > > > > > > > > Florian > > > > > > > > ilanode wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hello, Since I gave the A105 a try out of curiosity I'm tempted > > > to get > > > > > one. Pro: Incredible good job on bass patches. Con: based on an > > > > > obsolete IC. From my *brief* experience I thought it works best > > > with > > > > > square waveforms and is otherwise quite ordinary (I could be > > > wrong). > > > > > I'd like to know from other A105-experienced list members their > > > > > opinion (por and con) about this filter. Sure, it's all a > > matter > > > of > > > > > taste so it might help to add that I like best the vactrol > > > filters, > > > > > A122 but hardly use the A124 and A120. Since the very chip is > > > also > > > > > used in some PPG synths I should add that I have some of the > > PPG > > > > > waveforms for my Blacet Mini Wave. Thanks for any input, Ingo > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Florian Anwander |ConSol > > > > Tel. +49(89)45841-133 |Consulting&Solutions Software GmbH > > > > Fax +49(89)45841-111 |Franziskanerstr. 38, D-81669 München > > > > email: florian.anwander@ |http://www.consol.de > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------- > > > > All New Yahoo! Mail Tired of Vi@gr@! come-ons? Let our > > > SpamGuard protect you. > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------- > > > All New Yahoo! Mail Tired of Vi@gr@! come-ons? Let our SpamGuard > > protect you. > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Message
A112 -> was: Re: Thoughts on A105 Filter (SSM2044 )
2006-06-27 by selfoscillate
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.