I've almost expected that:) My point was: If use the A122 for tri. waves it still presents some of it's typically characteristics. While on the other hand the A105 appeared here to be faceless even though it is probably the most characterfull VFC I've heard so far if it's only fed with square waves. Maybe any filter looses it's typically sound on waves with less over tones, however, the A105 characteristics seems to decline more rapidly... But I could be mislead on the latter. Regards, Ingo (I replied to this before but my message disappeared. Hope it won't go to the list twice.) --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, Florian Anwander <Florian.Anwander@...> wrote: > > Hi Ingo > > > square wave. According to my memories it did a less spectacular job > > on triangular waves?! > Triangular waves nearly have nothing (no over tones) to filter, so what > job should a filter do on them? > > Florian >
Message
Re: Thoughts on A105 Filter (SSM2044 )
2006-06-27 by ilanode
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.