Yahoo Groups archive

Doepfer

Index last updated: 2026-04-29 00:15 UTC

Message

Re: 188: which one?

2006-08-28 by selfoscillate

--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "southsubnotsubdude" <carfull@...> 
wrote:
>
> i'm getting ready to purchase one of these units, not sure which...i 
> figured the best was to go with the 1024 as i'd like to do classic 
> analog delays along with some tuned feedback loop stuff and whatever 
> crazy patching will come up with...sound like a plan? the other 
option 
> would be to get two units with overlapping times/specified function i 
> suppose....but i ain't rich so i'd really rather not...does this make 
> any sense? whaddy'all think? what is you purchase approach?
>


i think that the 1024 stages version is a good allrounder.
it is not that suitable for longer delays, because you will
hear the clock noise when the delay time gets bigger than 50 ms.
in this case you have to use a lowpass filter at the bbd output
to remove the clock noise (unless you want that noise to
be audible).

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.