hello ingo, option 2 is best and the most practical!! but, if the multiturn knob looks realy nice (like on the ems vcs3) i would prefer the multiturn knob... anyway, for me, option 2 or option 3 are better than option 1 for sure! best regards, Bakis. --- selfoscillate <synaptic_music@yahoo.com> wrote: > > hello list, > > i'd like to start a poll, but want to collect > additional ideas first. > > the preliminary frontpanel design of the a111/2 > dynamic vco > offers two knobs for tuning: coarse tune and fine > tune. > lets say, that this is option 1. > > actually there are two other ideas regarding the > tuning controls. > > option 2: > an additional octave switch (like on the a111), > so we would have three controls for tuning. > > option 3: > a single multiturn tuning knob (similar to the > zeroscillator > tuning knob, but probably not that big in size), so > we would have only one knob for tuning. this would > be the > most expensive solution tough. > > any other suggestions? > > btw, from my personal preference i would prefer > option 2. > > best wishes > > ingo > > > > > > Bakis Sirros - Parallel Worlds [Doepfer_a100] group owner http://www.parallel-worlds-music.com http://www.myspace.com/parallelworldsmusic http://www.shimarecords.co.uk http://www.rubber.gr Athens-Greece __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
Message
Re: [Doepfer_a100] A111/2 tuning knob question
2006-09-11 by Bakis Sirros
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.