hello dieter, ok, poll coming very soon! but, how will this passive mixer be connected to the a138a/b? will it need soldering to the a138a/b's pcb? or, externaly with a patchcable to one of the a138a/b inputs? best regards, Bakis. --- hardware@doepfer.de wrote: > > Dieter, > > > > that would be interesting as it would save me > daisy chaining mixers and > > loosing an i/p > > > > david > > > > David Salter > > Senior Consultant > > PSG > > David, > > the mod is simple: > > For the old version of A-138a/b remove the dual > opamp IC1 (TL062) of one of > the two modules and connect pin #2 of IC1 (i.e. the > inverting input pin of > the first opamp) of both modules. The module with > the missing IC1 has no > longer a output signal available. If you want to > have a output of this > module connect pin #7 of IC1 (i.e. output of the > second opamp) of both > modules. Now you have two outputs with adjustable > levels available. > > For the new version of A-138a/b its similar but here > a quad opamp (TL064) is > used. Remove the quad opamp IC1 (TL064) of one of > the two modules and > connect pin #9 of IC1 (i.e. the inverting input pin > of the first opamp) of > both modules. The module with the missing IC1 has no > longer a output signal > available. If you want to have a output connect the > output sockets of both > modules. In this case the output of the second > module cannot be adjusted > (different circuit compared to the old version). But > you may connect the pin > header JP2 of the first module to the output of the > second module. Then you > have the inverted output available. > > For the polarizing mixer A-138c remove IC3 (TL062) > of one of the two modules > and connect pin #6 of IC3 (i.e. the inverting input > pin of the mixing opamp) > of both modules. The module with the missing IC3 has > no longer a output > signal available. If you want to have a output of > this module connect pin #1 > of IC3 (i.e. output of the final opamp) of both > modules. In this case the > level is the same for both outputs. The master > control of the second module > has no function. > > We already discussed a simple "mixing expander" > module that could be used to > add 5 more inputs to A-138a/b. It will be about > 20-30% cheaper than an > A-138a/b as no integrated circuits and no power > supply are necessary for > such a simple module (only a front panel with five > sockets, five > potentiometers+knobs and five resistors). How about > a poll ? > > Good luck, > Dieter Doepfer > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > Bakis Sirros - Parallel Worlds [Doepfer_a100] group owner http://www.parallel-worlds-music.com http://www.myspace.com/parallelworldsmusic http://www.shimarecords.co.uk http://www.rubber.gr Athens-Greece ____________________________________________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta. http://new.mail.yahoo.com
Message
Re: AW: [Doepfer_a100] Re: 8 channel cv mixer
2006-11-13 by Bakis Sirros
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.