right... exactly! best regards, Bakis. --- selfoscillate <synaptic_music@yahoo.com> wrote: > > Hello Denis, > > > > of course it would be possible to add four VCAs. > But this would at > least double the price of the module. I think one or > two dual VCAs A- > 132 would be a good solution for this application. > But of course we > could add the VCAs to the module if the user prefer > this solution. > How about a poll ? At the current state of the > development it would > still be possible to add the VCA feature. > > > > Best wishes > > Dieter > > > > > hello dieter, > > from my point of view it would make sense to add a > quad vca > which controls the amplitude of all four lfo's > simultaneously > with only one voltage and/or knob. this would not > add as much > to the price of the module as fully separate vca's. > > if someone would need separate control of the lfo's, > then > external vca's should be a good solution (2x a132 or > similar). > it's a modular system and four independent vca's > would > be a waste of resources if you could use them for > the > lfo amplitudes only. > > best wishes > > ingo > > > > > Bakis Sirros - Parallel Worlds [Doepfer_a100] group owner http://www.parallel-worlds-music.com http://www.myspace.com/parallelworldsmusic http://www.shimarecords.co.uk http://www.rubber.gr Athens-Greece ____________________________________________________________________________________ Cheap talk? Check out Yahoo! Messenger's low PC-to-Phone call rates. http://voice.yahoo.com
Message
Re: [Doepfer_a100] suggestion on the new A-143-9 (Re: News)
2006-12-13 by Bakis Sirros
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.