Doepfer

yeah man, that is really taking the back to analogue thing too far!

Richard

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: John 
  To: Doepfer a100 
  Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2006 6:11 PM
  Subject: Re: AW: [Doepfer_a100] suggestion on the new A-143-9 (Re: News)


  Your email is set to the year 1970.

  On 6/25/70 8:22 PM, "denis goekdag" <q-art@gmx.net> wrote:

  > 
  > 
  > 
  > 
  > Dieter,
  > 
  > i see your point, but in this particular case a common attenuator,
  > voltage controlled if possible, acting on all outputs simultaneously
  > would be great; there are a lot of possible applications i can imagine
  > where one would want to have identical modulation intensities at all
  > destinations, just phase-shifted in relation to each other. making all
  > those modulation amounts voltage controlled at the destinations by
  > inserting VCA's would be a LOT of work in comparison to just modulating
  > overall output level on the source.
  > 
  > just my 2 cents ;-)
  > 
  > denis
  > Am 11.12.2006 um 10:31 schrieb <hardware@doepfer.de
  > <mailto:hardware%40doepfer.de> >:
  > 
  >>>> > > > A-143-9 Voltage Controlled Quadrature LFO: www.doepfer.de/a1439.htm
  >>> > >
  >>> > > This module looks quite nice to me, but IMHO, one ore more built-in
  >>> > > (passive) attentuator(s) would make it even more versatile.
  >>> > >
  >>> > > Either a single attn. for all four outputs simultaneously or four
  >>> > > attns, one for each output.
  >>> > >
  >>> > > It might add some extra width to the module, but the added benefit
  >>> > > seems worth it to me.
  >>> > >
  >>> > > Best regards,
  >>> > > Joost
  >> >
  >> > The basic concept of the A-100 is that the attenuators are located at
  >> > the CV
  >> > inputs. Only modules that may be used normally as the last module in
  >> > an
  >> > audio chain (e.g. mixers, VCAs) are equipped with attenuators at the
  >> > outputs.
  >> >
  >> > Best wishes
  >> > Dieter Doepfer
  >> >
  >> > 
  >> > 
  > 
  > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
  > 
  > 
  > 

  [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



   

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]