Doepfer

lol.....actually 1970 i wasn't around to do *anything* (including 
writing not-yet-invented emails)....i guess i should put a new buffer 
battery in my laptop :-)

i fully agree to the notion of one quad vca with common voltage control 
for all outputs, that's what i meant in the first place....as for 
*quadrature* applications this is all you'd really need, just without 
the hassle of 4 extra VCA modules.  for "synchronous, out-of-phase 
modulation" applications aka *individually different* amplitudes you 
can use seperate VCA's with the benefit of increased flexibility.

cheers,
d
Am 13.12.2006 um 20:29 schrieb Richard:

> yeah man, that is really taking the back to analogue thing too far!
>
>  Richard
>
>  ----- Original Message -----
>  From: John
>  To: Doepfer a100
>  Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2006 6:11 PM
>  Subject: Re: AW: [Doepfer_a100] suggestion on the new A-143-9 (Re: 
> News)
>
>  Your email is set to the year 1970.
>
>  On 6/25/70 8:22 PM, "denis goekdag" <q-art@gmx.net> wrote:
>
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  > Dieter,
>  >
>  > i see your point, but in this particular case a common attenuator,
>  > voltage controlled if possible, acting on all outputs simultaneously
>  > would be great; there are a lot of possible applications i can 
> imagine
>  > where one would want to have identical modulation intensities at all
>  > destinations, just phase-shifted in relation to each other. making 
> all
>  > those modulation amounts voltage controlled at the destinations by
>  > inserting VCA's would be a LOT of work in comparison to just 
> modulating
>  > overall output level on the source.
>  >
>  > just my 2 cents ;-)
>  >
>  > denis
>  > Am 11.12.2006 um 10:31 schrieb <hardware@doepfer.de
>  > <mailto:hardware%40doepfer.de> >:
>  >
>  >>>> > > > A-143-9 Voltage Controlled Quadrature LFO: 
> www.doepfer.de/a1439.htm
>  >>> > >
>  >>> > > This module looks quite nice to me, but IMHO, one ore more 
> built-in
>  >>> > > (passive) attentuator(s) would make it even more versatile.
>  >>> > >
>  >>> > > Either a single attn. for all four outputs simultaneously or 
> four
>  >>> > > attns, one for each output.
>  >>> > >
>  >>> > > It might add some extra width to the module, but the added 
> benefit
>  >>> > > seems worth it to me.
>  >>> > >
>  >>> > > Best regards,
>  >>> > > Joost
>  >> >
>  >> > The basic concept of the A-100 is that the attenuators are 
> located at
>  >> > the CV
>  >> > inputs. Only modules that may be used normally as the last 
> module in
>  >> > an
>  >> > audio chain (e.g. mixers, VCAs) are equipped with attenuators at 
> the
>  >> > outputs.
>  >> >
>  >> > Best wishes
>  >> > Dieter Doepfer
>  >> >
>  >> >
>  >> >
>  >
>  > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>  >
>  >
>  >
>
>  [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>  [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>  
>   

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]