Yahoo Groups archive

Doepfer

Index last updated: 2026-04-29 00:15 UTC

Message

AW: AW: [Doepfer_a100] suggestion on the new A-143-9 (Re: News)

2006-12-18 by hardware@doepfer.de

> i see your point, but in this particular case a common attenuator, 
> voltage controlled if possible, acting on all outputs simultaneously 
> would be great; there are a lot of possible applications i can imagine 
> where one would want to have identical modulation intensities at all 
> destinations, just phase-shifted in relation to each other. making all 
> those modulation amounts voltage controlled at the destinations by 
> inserting VCA's would be a LOT of work in comparison to just modulating 
> overall output level on the source.

We discussed the additional VCA option for the A-143-9 and have another suggestion:

How about a separate quad VCA module with one common control (manual + ext. CV) for all VCAs. This module could be used even for other applications than only for the sine/cosine outputs of the A-143-9. E.g. for the other four-fold modulation modules of the A-143-x series like the quad AD, quad ADSR or quad LFO. A separate quad VCA module would not be very much more expensive than four VCAs integrated into the A-143-9 (4 additional sockets plus a separate front panel). After all the quad VCA section of the A-143-9 would be also a separate pc board containing the four VCAs. If we add four input sockets and make a separate front panel we would have a separate quad VCA module which is from my point of view more flexible than four VCAs only for the A-143-9.

Tell me what you think.

Best wishes
Dieter Doepfer

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.