Tops idea. Eurorack is shy a quad vca something fierce. Please do the blacet thing and break off one of them for use alone, if possible! On Dec 18, 2006, at 7:51 AM, hardware@doepfer.de wrote: > > i see your point, but in this particular case a common attenuator, > > voltage controlled if possible, acting on all outputs simultaneously > > would be great; there are a lot of possible applications i can > imagine > > where one would want to have identical modulation intensities at all > > destinations, just phase-shifted in relation to each other. > making all > > those modulation amounts voltage controlled at the destinations by > > inserting VCA's would be a LOT of work in comparison to just > modulating > > overall output level on the source. > > We discussed the additional VCA option for the A-143-9 and have > another suggestion: > > How about a separate quad VCA module with one common control > (manual + ext. CV) for all VCAs. This module could be used even for > other applications than only for the sine/cosine outputs of the > A-143-9. E.g. for the other four-fold modulation modules of the > A-143-x series like the quad AD, quad ADSR or quad LFO. A separate > quad VCA module would not be very much more expensive than four > VCAs integrated into the A-143-9 (4 additional sockets plus a > separate front panel). After all the quad VCA section of the > A-143-9 would be also a separate pc board containing the four VCAs. > If we add four input sockets and make a separate front panel we > would have a separate quad VCA module which is from my point of > view more flexible than four VCAs only for the A-143-9. > > Tell me what you think. > > Best wishes > Dieter Doepfer > > >
Message
Re: AW: AW: [Doepfer_a100] suggestion on the new A-143-9 (Re: News)
2006-12-20 by damon
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.