Yahoo Groups archive

Doepfer

Index last updated: 2026-04-29 00:15 UTC

Message

Re: AW: AW: [Doepfer_a100] suggestion on the new A-143-9 (Re: News)

2006-12-20 by damon

Tops idea.  Eurorack is shy a quad vca something fierce.  Please do  
the blacet thing and break off one of them for use alone, if possible!

On Dec 18, 2006, at 7:51 AM, hardware@doepfer.de wrote:

> > i see your point, but in this particular case a common attenuator,
> > voltage controlled if possible, acting on all outputs simultaneously
> > would be great; there are a lot of possible applications i can  
> imagine
> > where one would want to have identical modulation intensities at all
> > destinations, just phase-shifted in relation to each other.  
> making all
> > those modulation amounts voltage controlled at the destinations by
> > inserting VCA's would be a LOT of work in comparison to just  
> modulating
> > overall output level on the source.
>
> We discussed the additional VCA option for the A-143-9 and have  
> another suggestion:
>
> How about a separate quad VCA module with one common control  
> (manual + ext. CV) for all VCAs. This module could be used even for  
> other applications than only for the sine/cosine outputs of the  
> A-143-9. E.g. for the other four-fold modulation modules of the  
> A-143-x series like the quad AD, quad ADSR or quad LFO. A separate  
> quad VCA module would not be very much more expensive than four  
> VCAs integrated into the A-143-9 (4 additional sockets plus a  
> separate front panel). After all the quad VCA section of the  
> A-143-9 would be also a separate pc board containing the four VCAs.  
> If we add four input sockets and make a separate front panel we  
> would have a separate quad VCA module which is from my point of  
> view more flexible than four VCAs only for the A-143-9.
>
> Tell me what you think.
>
> Best wishes
> Dieter Doepfer
>
>
>

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.