Yahoo Groups archive

Doepfer

Index last updated: 2026-04-29 00:15 UTC

Message

[Doepfer_a100] suggestion on the new A-143-9 (Re: News)

2006-12-21 by levka0

IMHO, this would be most interesting if this Q-VCA could also be 
connected to the A-149-9 behind the front pannels with a flat-cable 
(like A-149-1/2 and A-160/1), omitting the need for 4 extra patch 
cables.

It would offer the combined benefits of efficient prepatching 
functionality as well as modular versatility. Without connecting 
this "under water" flat cable, this VCA could then be used for many 
other modules beside the A-143-9.

Is this perhaps a feasible idea ?

Best regards,
Joost






> We discussed the additional VCA option for the A-143-9 and have 
another suggestion:
> 
> How about a separate quad VCA module with one common control 
(manual + ext. CV) for all VCAs. This module could be used even for 
other applications than only for the sine/cosine outputs of the A-
143-9. E.g. for the other four-fold modulation modules of the A-143-
x series like the quad AD, quad ADSR or quad LFO. A separate quad 
VCA module would not be very much more expensive than four VCAs 
integrated into the A-143-9 (4 additional sockets plus a separate 
front panel). After all the quad VCA section of the A-143-9 would be 
also a separate pc board containing the four VCAs. If we add four 
input sockets and make a separate front panel we would have a 
separate quad VCA module which is from my point of view more 
flexible than four VCAs only for the A-143-9.
> 
> Tell me what you think.
> 
> Best wishes
> Dieter Doepfer
>

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.