IMHO, this would be most interesting if this Q-VCA could also be connected to the A-149-9 behind the front pannels with a flat-cable (like A-149-1/2 and A-160/1), omitting the need for 4 extra patch cables. It would offer the combined benefits of efficient prepatching functionality as well as modular versatility. Without connecting this "under water" flat cable, this VCA could then be used for many other modules beside the A-143-9. Is this perhaps a feasible idea ? Best regards, Joost > We discussed the additional VCA option for the A-143-9 and have another suggestion: > > How about a separate quad VCA module with one common control (manual + ext. CV) for all VCAs. This module could be used even for other applications than only for the sine/cosine outputs of the A- 143-9. E.g. for the other four-fold modulation modules of the A-143- x series like the quad AD, quad ADSR or quad LFO. A separate quad VCA module would not be very much more expensive than four VCAs integrated into the A-143-9 (4 additional sockets plus a separate front panel). After all the quad VCA section of the A-143-9 would be also a separate pc board containing the four VCAs. If we add four input sockets and make a separate front panel we would have a separate quad VCA module which is from my point of view more flexible than four VCAs only for the A-143-9. > > Tell me what you think. > > Best wishes > Dieter Doepfer >
Message
[Doepfer_a100] suggestion on the new A-143-9 (Re: News)
2006-12-21 by levka0
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.