Doepfer

i think that's a great idea.
best regards,
Bakis.



--- levka0 <levka@dds.nl> wrote:

> IMHO, this would be most interesting if this Q-VCA
> could also be 
> connected to the A-149-9 behind the front pannels
> with a flat-cable 
> (like A-149-1/2 and A-160/1), omitting the need for
> 4 extra patch 
> cables.
> 
> It would offer the combined benefits of efficient
> prepatching 
> functionality as well as modular versatility.
> Without connecting 
> this "under water" flat cable, this VCA could then
> be used for many 
> other modules beside the A-143-9.
> 
> Is this perhaps a feasible idea ?
> 
> Best regards,
> Joost
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > We discussed the additional VCA option for the
> A-143-9 and have 
> another suggestion:
> > 
> > How about a separate quad VCA module with one
> common control 
> (manual + ext. CV) for all VCAs. This module could
> be used even for 
> other applications than only for the sine/cosine
> outputs of the A-
> 143-9. E.g. for the other four-fold modulation
> modules of the A-143-
> x series like the quad AD, quad ADSR or quad LFO. A
> separate quad 
> VCA module would not be very much more expensive
> than four VCAs 
> integrated into the A-143-9 (4 additional sockets
> plus a separate 
> front panel). After all the quad VCA section of the
> A-143-9 would be 
> also a separate pc board containing the four VCAs.
> If we add four 
> input sockets and make a separate front panel we
> would have a 
> separate quad VCA module which is from my point of
> view more 
> flexible than four VCAs only for the A-143-9.
> > 
> > Tell me what you think.
> > 
> > Best wishes
> > Dieter Doepfer
> >
> 
> 
> 


Bakis Sirros - Parallel Worlds
[Doepfer_a100] group owner
http://www.parallel-worlds-music.com
http://www.myspace.com/parallelworldsmusic
http://www.shimarecords.co.uk
http://www.rubber.gr
Athens-Greece

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com