I prefer also the mono version, looking at the AKS or similar solutions. I never thought of a polyphonic TKB. best regards Axel John schrieb: > > RELEASE THE MONO ONE!!!!! > > Regards, > John > > On 3/21/07 12:24 PM, "hardware@doepfer.de > <mailto:hardware%40doepfer.de>" <hardware@doepfer.de > <mailto:hardware%40doepfer.de>> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > >> > And what about the Doepfer (Touch) Keyboard? > >> > > >> > David Westling > > > > I have been waiting already for this question :-) > > > > This is the current state: the TBK is working in principle (e.g. the > Sonic > > State NAMM video 2006) but we we are not really pleased with the > > functionality as the working principle we use (hum noise detection) > allows > > only monophonic applications. It is not possible to touch a second > or third > > key for polphonic application. Actually we wanted to built a polyphonic > > device but we could not realize that with the hum noise principle. So we > > have two alternatives: publish the TKB as it is or start the design > from the > > beginning with another basic principle. In the first case the TKB > could be > > publishes within 2-3 months as only the case has to be made. The > electronics > > is working. If we have to start again I don't know how long it will take > > until the polyphonic version will work as it should. Another > principle would > > be the measurement of the skin resistance of the fingers. But for this > > solution one has to touch an area of each "key" that has a copper > structure > > like two nested combs very exactly. > > > > I think we will decide after the Frankfurt show how we continue. > > > > Best wishes > > Dieter Doepfer > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > >
Message
Re: AW: [Doepfer_a100] RE: AW: a1065 SEM filter
2007-03-21 by Axel Jungkunst
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.