Hi Florian, Ok, I see... that's where the envelope follower comes in! Indeed a good idea to try that with my existing A-100 set-up. Thanks and best regards, Wim --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, Florian Anwander <Florian.Anwander@...> wrote: > > Hi Wim > > > Yes I have that same feeling. The thing is quite expensive also. I > > think Moog tries to attract customers by advertising it as "a real Moog > > VCO" but I really don't think it sounds like a vintage Moog VCO after > > all. Anyway, I'm quite pleased with the A-110 and A-111. I'm still > > thinking of purchasing a Moog ring modulator (MF-102) which seems to > > give value for money. > > The A110 _is_ a Moog VCO its quite the same circuit, which was used in > the late seventies, early eighties for all Moog synths. > > I don't think that the VCO itself is the interesting part of this MF. It > is the envelope follower and the idea to create a pulse wave out of the > input signal and to use this for hard-syncing the VCO (crossmodulation > with external audio is more common). This sounds really great and is > definitely a patch, you should try with a modular synth. > > It requires a decent preparing of the input signal, and I think heres > the spot where the engineers of Moog did a good job. > > Florian >
Message
Re: Moog MF-107 "FreqBox"
2007-04-10 by Wim
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.