> Hallo group, > > are there any disadvantages in a BBD having more stages ? is 512 > "better" than 256 ? > > cheers, > > stu From the technical point of view the quality is worse for longer BBDs as the signal losses, noise and clock suppression are worse due to the higher number of "buckets" represented by very small capacitors in the pF range. Another point of view is the sound that can be generated with a longer or shorter BBD. As the typical clock frequencies are in the 10kHz...100kHz (200kHz for shorter BBDs) range for all BBDs one obtains different delay times for BBDs with different numbers of stages. Shorter delays are used for flanging or chorus effects and Karplus-Strong-Synthesis. Longer delays cause audio delay effects. You find a detailed list of delay times with reference to clock frequencies and number of BBD stages in the A-188-1 user's manual. The most flexible solution is a tapped BBD (as used in the A-188-2) as one has available six taps with stages between 396 and 3328. Best wishes Dieter Doepfer
Message
AW: [Doepfer_a100] BBD question
2007-09-11 by hardware@doepfer.de
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.