Pierre, you find my comments written inline. Dieter Doepfer > Dear Mr Doepfer, > > What about normalled cv inputs and polarizers instead of attenuators ? Polarizers are a good idea. But I don't know what you mean with "normalled cv inputs". Controlling all CV inputs with the same signal does not make much sense for this module. > The "4 HP expansion module with 8 sockets" is also attractive. > > I'm not interested in a manual phase shift control because I would > like to control the A1372 with an A1431. Without the offset control you will not be able to cover the full phase shift range with a unipolar signal (like the A-143-1). With a bipolar signal (e.g. A-143-3) the full range is covered as with zero CV the phase shift is in the center position. > Finally, I would like to say that I love affordable 8HP Doepfer > modules. They leave space and money for your other great modules (A103 > , A107, A1112, A143x, A155 ... too numerous to mention). > > Best, > > Pierre, > > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "matijnboshoven" > <matijnboshoven@...> wrote: > > > > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, <hardware@> wrote: > > > > > > Dear members, > > > > > > thank you for the poll results. For the A-189-1 that's what I > > expected. For > > > the A-137-2 I'm a bit surpised that only 8% vote for a manual phase > > shift > > > control. From my point of view this is a very important function. > > Without > > > this additional controls only symmetrical signals (like LFOs) can be > > used > > > meaningful to control the phase shift. With an ADSR or another > unipolar > > > (only positive) CV only 50% of the phase shift can be covered. Maybe > > I will > > > override the poll results in this regard. Sorry :-( > > > > > > Even for the A-189-1 we think about a solution that would cover the > > other > > > options too. E.g. one of the 16 positions of the rotary switch will > > address > > > the voltage controlled mode selection and we will add a terminal on > > the pc > > > board that can be used to connect an external CV (e.g. the output of > > a mixer > > > or polarizing mixer). > > > > > > Thank you > > > Dieter Doepfer > > > > > Please override the poll on the A-137-2, I (and I presume more people) > > didn't understand it.
Message
AW: [Doepfer_a100] Re: Poll results for Doepfer_a100
2008-02-11 by hardware@doepfer.de
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.