In a message dated 2/13/2008 2:03:21 AM Pacific Standard Time, hardware@doepfer.de writes: concerning the modules mentioned by you (delay, bit crusher/cruncher) it's wrong to say that we duplicate parallel module developments by other companies! The bit cruncher and delay are a sub-functions of the universal AD/DA module and has been discussed for a long time. I'd recommend to look for example at these messages from me: dear dieter, again, i must apologise - i didn`t mean to create the impression that you were "borrowing" others ideas but rather serendipity comes into play - people find themselves on similar development tracks and because they`ve "started", they feel the need to "finish". my thought was if you were to see someone else doing something close to what you were thinking about, you might put your idea on hold to see what a final product looks like and if its worth bringing out something "better" *or* leaving that idea and looking for something else unusual to develop hence spreading everyones efforts and encouraging even more unusual module development. i know you had put forth the generalized ad / da module idea long before the malgorithm came out. sorry for the mis-understanding. best, dave **************The year's hottest artists on the red carpet at the Grammy Awards. Go to AOL Music. (http://music.aol.com/grammys?NCID=aolcmp00300000002565) [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: AW: [Doepfer_a100] new polls / module idea`s -
2008-02-13 by davevosh@aol.com
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.