i would also mention that doepfer's prices, at least in europe, are way better than the competition's, with the exception of analog solutions'. as far as cv-digital goes, this is a relatively new area for everyone, and the more creative input the better. stu > > > In a message dated 2/13/2008 6:21:06 AM Pacific Standard Time, > hardware@... writes: > > . From my point of view it's the wrong idea that we have to give up a > module after the announcement because another company finishes a similar > module (with or without taking the ideas from us or this group). On the > other hand we normally do not start to develop a module if there is a > similar module available on the market (whereas one could discuss the term > "similar"). But if the idea came from us or was born in this group I think > we should have the right to release this module even if another manufacturer > offers a similar module in the meantime. It's not only because of the money > that has been already invested (the development of a new module is very > expensive and these charges pay off not before the serial production begins) > but also as a matter of principle. > > > > > dieter, > i understand completely your point. i was speaking to the idea of > "efficiency" in terms of freeing up time and money for alternate developments just as > one way i was looking at the issue and using those proposed module polls as an > example, i would have said push the v.c. granular idea its being a fairly > new thing to bring to analog modulars over the v.c. delay module as being a less > radical (?) module. > best, > dave > > > > > > **************The year's hottest artists on the red carpet at the Grammy > Awards. Go to AOL Music. > (http://music.aol.com/grammys?NCID=aolcmp00300000002565) > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >
Message
Re: AW: [Doepfer_a100] new polls / module idea`s -
2008-02-13 by Stu Grimshaw
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.