Doug (03:02 PM 3/12/2008) wrote: >Hi Mark, all, newcomer here and very little response to questions >I've posted here over the last few weeks. Assuming it is due to >disinterest. It could however be that I did get reponses, but missed >them because I am new to this forum interface. I take it you're reading this through Yahoo's web interface? It's pretty awful, especially when a group gets busy. I know that your stereo question got some response, but it was also during the time when Deiter (Mr. Doepfer) was getting ready for Frankfurt and there was a LOT of list traffic. If you have a normal email reader (Outlook, Thunderbird, Eudora, etc) you may want to read the list that way instead. It's a LOT easier to handle. >Summary of posts follows: Hmm... ok, I remember one of these posts... :) >1) Why not have more than just 1 pair of CV/Gate on the back plane? >Why not have say, four pair per backplane? The various pairs could >be selectable using jumpers on the backplane at each ribbon connect. >This was a naive question which reflected one of my first >observations after purchasing my A-100. Since then I have concluded >(correctly? don't know) there is simply no good reason. This one is "interesting" in that I don't have a stock Doepfer cabinet. For me, I start using mults panels or custom "split" cables that I've made. >2) Given my list of current modules, and a couple of prospective >paths, what might be a recommended way to get two voices in stereo? >Since asking this question, and discussing this with the folks at >Analog Haven, it seems the Cwejman stereo mixer is probably the way >to go. This is the question I remember, and I think the list got to the point of pondering "how stereo do you want to be"? So, truly duophonic with separate VCO(s) and filters for each side, or are you "happy" with just splitting the signal at the filter and processing LR channels there? >3) I'm finding what seems to be some frequency filtering going on in >mixer modules, and perhaps others. Has anyone else seen this? Has >anyone looked at the frequency response of various Doepfer modules >(other than filters)? Is there a known freq response spec published >by Doepfer? Dunno about these... This would be best answered by Deiter, and I think he's still in Frankfurt. >As the author of these subjects, I am not inclined to think them >uninteresting, of course, but I am willing to accept that judgement. Again, I think that part of the issue you've seen is that your messages got lost in the sea of stuff just before the Musikmesse. Now seeing what you're looking for, you may wanna try the SynthSite's list, or Muff's forum. Muff's forum would be good 'cause of the MUCH better reader interface; SynthSites 'cause of the people there - BUT! The SS list isn't modular centric, so you'll get people kinda goin' "umm, I just fire up my Virus and press a key to get stereo...". :) Hope some of that babble helps... Mark
Message
Re: [Doepfer_a100] Re: Recommended online forum for modular synthesis.
2008-03-13 by Mark Pulver
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.