Doepfer

I'm not familiar with the SH-101's sequencer but if it is anything  
like the Sequencial Pro-ones sequencer - count me in. I used to have  
3 of those slaved to the gate outs of a 808 and it was great. All I  
need is a record and play switch, clock in and reset, CV in and out  
and I'm set. if it remembered when turned off that would be great  
too. Multiple tracks (switchable manualy) would be a plus for sure  
but if it is cheap enough I would just buy more of them. Not many  
steps need be recorded either (analog sequencers are typically 8-16  
after all). The best for me would be as simple as possible - leave  
the heavy lifting for a computer. I just would like to load notes in  
fast and play them back via a external pulse train - it doesn't even  
have to record note length for me.
-James




On Sep 2, 2008, at 3:13 PM, Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com wrote:

>
> Enter your vote today!  A new poll has been created for the
> Doepfer_a100 group:
>
> What about making a a-100 sequenser in the spirit of the roland  
> sh-101.
> Many of my friends (including me :)use that sequencer to control  
> their systems.
> It´s simple, no menus, it´s fast and lovely to use :)
> The only things it´s missing is pattern memmorys and
> tape interface to store on (easier than midi dump,
> everybody has a mp3 or md  player/recorder :)
>
>   o yes!! I love stepsequensers
>   o no!! those roland thingis aren´t intellectual enuff ;)
>
>
> To vote, please visit the following web page:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Doepfer_a100/surveys?id=12810439
>
> Note: Please do not reply to this message. Poll votes are
> not collected via email. To vote, you must go to the Yahoo! Groups
> web site listed above.
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>