> I've got the Malgorithm & an Alesis Bitrman. I've ordered the Doepfer > unit and can post > some examples once I get it. if you've got the time that would be great but just your general impression would do too! > The Malgo and Bitrman are both excellent & can be set to do exactly the > same sound in > bit reduction mode. However, the Malgorithm is much more flexible in > what it does. the big difference between the malgorithm and the doepfer module is the variable sample freq i guess, and that might persuade me in the end because i could live without the vc input for going through the different modes but i wondered if the variable sample freq can also be versatile while the sine (carrier?) wave isn't mixed in with the signal too obvious if you know what i mean. i mean can it be fun without bleeping too loud? > They are two different beasts and I'm happy to have both. I'll get back > with info on the > A-189-1 when I've got it. great man! i appreciate it, greetz, anton > > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com > <mailto:Doepfer_a100%40yahoogroups.com>, "freq_divider" <freq.div@...> > wrote: > > > > I wonder if anyone has compared directly the harvestman malgorithm and > > the doepfer bit cruncher? I've heard the excellent doepfer examples by > > Soy Sos and i saw some malgorithm action on youtube but i'm not sure > > about which one i prefer (if you forget the price difference and only > > compare the sound). > > > > greetz, anton > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com > Version: 8.0.169 / Virus Database: 270.7.0/1685 - Release Date: 9/22/2008 4:08 PM >
Message
Re: [Doepfer_a100] Re: Bitcrunch shootout?
2008-09-23 by Frequency Divider
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.