Hmm... that sounds a little bit 'thin' to my ears. I'm sure it's nothing a bit of compression wouldn't solve, but the Doepfer stuff is beginning to seem a little less rich, overall. Damnit. it all seemed so simple a few hours ago... --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, Ross Goniakowski <carfull@...> wrote: > > i made a little demo track using only the A-110 as source for someone else, i posted it here: > > http://www.muffwiggler.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1726 > > > > ----- Original Message ---- > From: madrayken <dene.carter@...> > To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com > Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2008 4:27:09 AM > Subject: [Doepfer_a100] Decent samples > > > I'm buying my first modular, and going for all Doepfer modules for > the sake of size (main modules being 2 x A-110s, an A-111, a A-120 > and an A-121). I must say that it took a really long time to come to > this decision, and it still feels like a punt in the dark. > > I put most of this down to the lack of decent, clean samples. The > example mp3s on the doepfer site are, without fail, some of the least > impressive, crunchy demos I've ever heard. I'd even go as far as > saying they are actively offputting (bar http://moog- > 3c.analogue. org/network/ demosongs/ DoepferA100_ Morgan_Excerpt_ from_Enco > unter.mp3, which is the product of a pretty large, unknown system - > not exactly helpful in terms of marketing Doepfer goodies). > > As a result, I'm taking it on faith (and - admittedly - reviews) that > the modules actually sound pretty good, and that I won't regret my > purchase. > > Anyone else feel the same when they first splashed out on a modular? > Anyone have any links to sites with nice clean examples of VCOs? > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >
Message
Re: Decent samples
2008-09-23 by madrayken
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.