Doepfer

The group spent a couple weeks discussing the upcoming touch 
controller at length. How is that on-topic, and the MAQ and ...Werk 
sequencers off-topic?

The only differences are: (1) the MAQ and ...werk sequencers already 
exist, and (2) a lot of people are unhappy with them and the lack 
of support from Doepfer. So in order to stifle the discontent, it 
gets labeled as "off-topic".

I suppose after the touch keyboard goes into production, it will be 
considered on-topic here as long as no one complains about it.

BTW I always get prompt replies from Dieter, but Chris never 
responds at all to my questions.

Joe
--- In Doepfer_a100@y..., "Andreas Lindholm" <andreas.k.lindholm@t...> 
wrote:
> We have been on this many times and let us say that it is a matter 
of some
> disagreement. Some think it is a logical extension to the A100 and 
others
> not. But Doepfer has marketed it as such before through their 
retailers and
> webpage. Now they seem to have polised some of it away but I 
remember having
> read this like "the shaltwerk is the ideal sequencing solution for 
your
> analog synthesizers". So since they have been sold as extensions to 
some
> users in my eyes makes them such since they are made by the same 
company and
> share looks and features with the rest of the range.
> 
> To get a bit off topic here, if it wasn't made for the A100, why 
bother to
> add cv and gate in the same voltage ranges as the rest. Why not use 
Yamaha
> v/hz or din sync? I think it speaks for itself, BMW doesn't make 
spoiler
> wings and stuff for Renault, right? Neither does Doepfer make 
controllers
> for others synths, it is for their own.
> 
> 
> > You´re quite right Florian. As far as I can tell the name of the
> > group is Doepfer system A100 modular synthesizer group NOT 
Schaltwerk
> > and the Schaltwerk is NOT part of the A100 system ........ is it?
> > Keld
> >
> >