Doepfer

My suspicion is there's a small but religious group here ( and on AH) that believe analog 
must to be sloppy and imprecise. But I suspect most musicians actually want precision and 
high quality designs in all their musical instruments and tools.

I think improving waveform quality in Doepfer VCOs will be good for sales :-)



--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, york luethje <ybl@...> wrote:
>
> Thanks for the great work!
> My suspicion is though that there are less than 20 people woldwide actually caring 
about this and knowledgeable enough to do the mod. Not an efficient use of management 
and r/d time in my optinion. 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ________________________________
> From: "yahoo@..." <yahoo@...>
> To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Wednesday, December 3, 2008 3:11:28 AM
> Subject: AW: [Doepfer_a100] Re: Sine wave discussion - Poll suggestion
> 
> 
>  
> > btw, in case there was a modified Sine circuit for the A111
> > produced, i would be probably not bothered to send my 8 A111's
> > back to doepfer to be 'converted' with the new sine design... it
> > would be much trouble and time lost, for me...
> 
> In case that we offer a "sine improvement kit" for the A-111 we try to find
> a solution that could be installed by each user who is a bit familiar with
> the soldering iron. The prototype of the sine converter we already have has
> to be installed instead of a resistor. I.e. one resistor has to be
> desoldered and the small board soldered to the two solder points of the
> former resistor. Another cable has to be connected to GND. Altogether it
> takes less than 5 minutes. But of course we would offer the service to
> modify an existing A-111.
> 
> Best wishes
> Dieter
> 
>     
> 
> 
>       
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>