Doepfer

Hello Dieter,
Thanks for the calculations.
I managed to get a working model going in my system.
It is however a bit flimsy with the divisions, I had to waste some mixers on
that.
I'll probably get some passive attenuators...

A dedicated unit like you mention would be very nice though.
Since al the divisions are fixed then and probably more accurate than what
my trembling hands set the knobs to..
I do see Florian's point that it will probably not sell very well.
That is also why I mentioned -very limited run-- of tendency mask generators
might be made by the people at Sonology.
(in the original TMG mail)


If anyone is interested I might be able to post some sound examples tomorrow
with a schematic of the patch a milked from DIeter's calculations.

Greetings,

Ernst










On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 12:24 PM, Florian Anwander <fanwander@mnet-online.de
> wrote:

>   Hi Dieter
>
>
> > If I understand everything the Tendency Mask Generator is nothing but a
> > random voltage source (e.g. A-118) processed by a VCA (that controls the
> > spread or width) and a unit that adds an offset voltage.
> That can be done with existing modules. I think this is a very
> specialized task, which won't be used very often or by many users.
> I fear the sales won't be that great. How good are the sales for similar
> specialized modules like the A149-Series?
>
> Florian
>
>  
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]