On 27 Jan 2009, at 01:17, achtung_999 wrote: //skipperdy skip// > > Most CV voltages in a modular are bipolar, with envelopes and > keyboard > > the most noteable exceptions. LFO's, S/H and what not all go through > > zero. Or more correctly: *can* go through zero. > > Yes I know that. And that still does not answer my question really.. > Let's say we have an pseudo-ideal CV> digital converter. It would > work from > 0 volts to anything, so no upper limit. (Just assume this..) > I would shift the CV up by the amount it needs to have the most > extreme > negative amplitude point to be 0 volts. > Let's assume this is 5 volts. My device now tracks it nicely and > records it > in whichever imaginative software format we might think of. > I now would like to use this signal to drive my modular. > I would take the output from the software via my reverse device and > shift > the resulting voltages down 5 volts.. > > In my opinion this would not be different than the original signal. > would > it? > In some way you are right, yes. There are certain CV's which don't yield the same result when "pulled down" with a negative bias (like, say, a negative halfwave rectifier), but that's not where your theory goes a bit wrong... It's in your assumption that there's no upper [voltage] limit [as a way of reasoning this through], and that the maximum required voltage is only 5 volts. Most, but not all, analog modular systems require +10V to use their full range (pitch is a good example). This would mean that your device should be able to output +20V to pull that voltage down to the required maximum range of +10V (and an additional -10V to have bipolarity). Now, what is going to happen when you don't need bipolarity ? You are going to send a signal ranging from zero to +20 volts to the CV inputs of your system ? I'd rather not do that. Furthermore, most modulars are hardwired [by technology] to accept a given [bipolar] range, and a big part of the circuits and control pots are matched to work with this. By using a "wrong" voltage to start with, and then fiddling with it to make it match, I reckon you're gonna end up with a big mess pretty soon. It's pretty clear, I think, that a device like this should at least start off with the correct range and properly engineered hardware to make it useable and worth something. > Sorry if I was unclear about this. > And yes, I know it's a hassle ;-) > Not a hassle. Just a fascinating subject. :-) _g
Message
Re: [Doepfer_a100] Re: a-112 - cv recording?
2009-01-27 by Guy Drieghe D.
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.