Doepfer

the polls are not useless.

they have helped, many many times, in the past, for Doepfer to decide features included in their designs and decisions about their forthcoming modules.

ok, of course, they are not always really valid due to the low number of participants (that's why i am always asking for the member to vote!) but they are indeed useful many times.


Bakis Sirros - Parallel Worlds / Interconnected / Memory Geist

[Doepfer_a100] group owner

www. parallel - worlds - music. com

www. myspace. com/ parallelworldsmusic

www. myspace. com/ interconnectedmusic

www. myspace. com/ memorygeist

www. DiN. org. uk

www. musicamaximamagnetica. com

www. shimarecords. co. uk

www. rubberrecords. gr

Athens - Greece

--- On Thu, 2/12/09, Monroe Eskew <monroe.eskew@gmail.com> wrote:
From: Monroe Eskew <monroe.eskew@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Doepfer_a100] Re: popular or not
To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
Date: Thursday, February 12, 2009, 9:56 PM











    
            It's better than not doing it!  Doepfer is one of the most democratic

companies I know.



On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 11:09 AM, laryn91 <caymus91@mac. com> wrote:



>   I can't believe that a simple uncontrolled poll of only 29 users is

> meaningful to you to base

> your product planning around it. I bet that only those who are emotionally

> invested will

> bother to vote and most everyone else will ignore the poll. It's

> meaningless data.

>

> It's like asking a 29 people what food they like and opening a restaurant

> menu based on

> that. I think you're better off to rely on your vision, business and

> marketing expertise than

> these useless polls.

>

> --- In Doepfer_a100@ yahoogroups. com <Doepfer_a100% 40yahoogroups. com>,

> <yahoo@...> wrote:

> >

> > > If one manufactures 100 units but has only 30 orders it will be a loss

> > (and we had indeed some such

> > > losses in the past, e.g. the A-100CGK, A-138x, A-164-1 or A-186).

> > > ....

> > >

> > > hello

> > > I do not want to be critical to much but instead of few option of

> > expanding mixers from 138 family

> > > one stereo with more inputs and pan cv would be just top

> > > and I think sell okay, theres so many people performing on A100

> > > and neets something portable and small. I cant take furniture on tour.

> > > And mixer did not apear, and still no manufactur do it. strange heh?

> > >

> > > best

> > > robert

> >

> > Robert,

> >

> > you do not criticize me but the poll results ! Many (but not all) of the

> > latest modules are based on suggestions by customers of this group. For

> the

> > A-138x everything started end of 2006 because some customers wanted to

> have

> > more than only 4 inputs for their A-138 mixers. The poll results for the

> > mixer expander A-138x from December 15, 2006 were these:

> >

> > POLL QUESTION: Would you like Doepfer to release a "Mixing Expander"

> module

> > that would be used to add 5 more inputs to A-138a/b? [It will be about

> > 20-30% cheaper than an A-138a/b, as no integrated circuits and no power

> > supply are necessary for such a simple module]

> >

> > CHOICES AND RESULTS

> > - Yes!, 19 votes, 67.86%

> > - maybe..., 4 votes, 14.29%

> > - No., 5 votes, 17.86%

> >

> >

> > Best wishes

> > Dieter Doepfer

> >

>

>  

>



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




 

      

    
    
	
	 
	
	








	


	
	


      

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]