On 2009-02-13, at 13:58, John V. Talbert wrote: > hello > I do not want to be critical to much but instead of few option of expanding mixers from 138 family > one stereo with more inputs and pan cv would be just top and I think sell okay, theres so many people performing on A100 > and neets something portable and small. In my mind, there are many areas where there is room for useful expansion: stereo (or quad/surround) mixer, patch matrix, arpeggiator, multi-touch performance surfaces (keyboard or not), digital oscillator, X/Y pad, a smaller and more affordable version of something like a Continuum (complete with it's own mountable multi CV out interface). YES YES YES! there is so much development on very detailed determined module but almost nothing as great stereo output mix / procesor there is noting which can be helpfull and I know some users who do not even know about this list and performing on A100 or just modulars and pretty sure they need good stereo mixer or something. what I read from post, most of people here just work on in in strudio (I am partly too) so most of oppinions are studio oriented of course I might be wrong. From other point of view a lot of musicians uses it as very experimental sonic tool, and complex stereophony is just more than welcome thanks ad all the best r ps. on myspace profile you can listen to one of my solo concerts recording where stereo and paning is the thing (name CTMcut or something) www.myspace.com/robertpiotrowicz www.musicagenera.net www.myspace.com/robertpiotrowicz
Message
stereo was popular or not
2009-02-15 by robert piotrowicz
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.