I agree Dieter cheapness is an important feature of this module and I think LEDs and audio frequencies are very worthwhile features! Richard yahoo@doepfer.de wrote: > > > > > the reason i think is that the triangle wave is much easier to > > produce than the sine. > > > > correct me if i'm wrong, Dieter. > > Whenever one designs an oscillator one has to decide which is the core > oscillator (e.g. sawtooth for A-110, triangle for A-111 and most of the > LFOs, sine for A-143-9). The other waveforms have to be derived by waveform > converters from the core waveform which always leads to imperfections > (except rectangle which is easy to generate by a comparator). The A-143-4 > uses a triangle core. A voltage controlled oscillator with a perfect sine is > already available: A-143-9 > > If we expand the A-143-4 by everything that is available in other > oscillators (additional waveforms, range or octave switches, hard sync, soft > sync, linear FM, additional CV inputs, LED display ...) the front panel > width and the price will increase and the advantage of a compact module with > only the most important functions is lost. The problem is to find the right > compromise between functions and price. > > Best wishes > Dieter Doepfer > >
Message
Re: AW: [Doepfer_a100] A143-4 Quad vc-LFO/VCO
2009-05-18 by Richard Scott
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.