I'm lucky enough to have enough non-identical modules to create quite a few voices. So you could say I'm running polyphonically but I would characterize what I'm doing as multitimbral and monophonic. I'm certainly not playing changing chords like on my polysynths. (I'm not counting the use of several VCOs in an otherwise mono voice as a chord). On the surface it seems like you could just get a bunch of Dark Energy modules or something similar and a multichannel MIDI to CV interface with polyphonic assignment of voices and think you have a polyphonic modular... well to me at least one big aspect is totally missing in the polyphonic puzzle... how in the world do you change the sound in unison other than slowly manually going up to each voice and changing one parameter at a time. What I at least feel is essential in a poly modular is the ability to control all the voices from a common set of controls.. With a fixed architecture voice there has been an answer since the 1970s. If you build a voice where every parameter is voltage controlled you can use a set of common controls on them or even a microprocessor could store every parameter for later recall. The stumbling block in a poly modular is the patchability. Florian mentions the SEM. They were built by adding extra hardware into the Oberheim Two, Four and Eight etc. voice polysynths. It's worth noting that they were not intended as modular synths. But an interesting aspect is the individual voices can be easily "patched out" modular style, as Tom Oberheim is offering this year as a configuration. One thing I and I'm sure others were thinking when he announced them was if he or a third party will make a a poly voice assigner (maybe the midi units are chainable? I'm not sure) and then what existed in the 70s but hasn't been reissued is the programmer which attempts to send parameter values to each voice module. Unfortunately it didn't deal with every parameter let alone the patch cords. The Korg PS series took a very unique approach. It does not allocate voices like nearly all polysynths including the Obergheim polys do. You get a separate VCF and VCA for each key but there is a set of 12 (24 or 36 for the 3200 and 3300) shared tunable oscillators with octave dividers and which is more an organ approach than a VCO style approach. The 3200 had memory recall of knob position. The patch field that qualifies it as a semi modular is not polyphonic. I believe polyfusion back in the 70s has a polyphonic CV keyboard but correct me if I'm wrong, nothing else supporting polyphony so it was change every parameter and patchord manually. Emu had a poly keyboard and a programmer that could store a few values so I guess that was a start but incomplete. I see Cyndustries has a simple module with some small groups of CV values In the early 80s you started to see polysynths with matrix modulation, which was steps toward a modular but not actually a modular. These synths added a lot more modulation options but the underlying architecture was still fixed and the matrix exists more or less within a CPU. Considering the limitations and hybrid technology in the Korg PS I don't really think the approach is that similar to the Nord Modular. The Nord Modular is virtual. As long as there is computing power available you just add an instance of the whole thing. Nothing is physical. It was funny to see the reproduction of smaller scale Korg Legacy MS-20 complete with patch cables, The hardware MS-20 was monophonic, The software simulation however is poly, similar to the Nord. The novelty twist with the Korg is the controller is a physical patch interface. No sound or voltage goes through the mini MS-20 but it senses the patch cords. and adjusts the virtual patch to include them I think the Buchla 200e changed things because the modules use encoders and most of the pots can have their settings stored and recalled. A few pots are just physical and are not stored as well as no oone has yet made a third party module that has knob recall. While there have been at least one matrix style storable patchbay out there that could be used in theory for some patch cord storage, I believe Buchla is the first to build one as part of a modular system. It's not perfect if you use many patch cords since it's a small matrix. You could buy a few of them though there would still be some compromise. It has up to 4 buses running for voices to more easily achieve polyphony direct from MIDI if you have enough of the same modules (or different modules if you don't mind). nick
Message
Re: polyphonic modulars
2009-08-26 by zaum
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.