> i agree, the size is great. one thing i always liked about doepfer was the > willingness to put module ideas out on the list for discussion. once in a > while, tho, this leads to "creeping feature-itis" causing a module to get > bigger or more expensive. this can still have a place but i`m finding myself > at a stage where i have the "complex" covered but could use simpler support > in a smaller size. a no-frills 4 or 6 hp a/d or adsr env. gen., 4hp lfo > and vco would be nice, just i.m.h.o.. > best, > dave i'm absolutely with dave there. the big fat sexy modules are nice, but i seldom think "shame there's no xxx module" but i'm often challenged by the lack of sone "toolbox" module (although some of them are in the pipeline or recently released). i could really use a dual or even quad lpf for all those little clean-up jobs, post bbd, for example. a low cost vco would indeed be cool, although that new quad lfo/vco thing looks veeerrrry tempting, despite its size. 4hp lfo is available from analogue solutions, including attenuated outputs and even a noise source, just in case anybody hasn't seen it. greetz, stu
Message
Re: A132-4 Quad Exp VCA/Mixer.
2009-10-03 by grimshaw_stuart
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.