Yahoo Groups archive

Doepfer

Index last updated: 2026-04-29 00:15 UTC

Message

Re: AW: [Doepfer_a100] awaiting arrival of A-143-4 quad vclfo/vco

2010-02-22 by Guy

Sorry to disagree, Florian, but the most essential aspect of a (musical) VCO is certainly not its "fine tuning" pot. The fine tuning is just a byproduct of its tuning pot. Use a very high value pot and you're set.
No, the most essential part of a VCO is the quality of its exponentiator. Building a decent VCO isn't all that difficult. Building a good VCO which tracks over a wide range is a whole different matter.

FWIW: I have 4 CEM-based VCO's in my Aemit system. They track over 10 octaves, and the "coarse tuning" pot sweeps through the whole range. Still, I can tune the VCO's in perfect unison quite easily. Though I have to add that they have fine tuning pots too, and I used very high quality pots for the tuning...

_g

--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, Florian Anwander <fanwander@...> wrote:
>
> Hi all
> 
> Dieter Doepfer schrieb:
> > The A-143-4 was planned as a VCLFO but not as VCO. 
> I think we should take in account, that there is an essential aspect 
> missing which is necessary for a real VCO:
> There is no fine tune. I assume the Frequ.-knob would cover a range of 
> around 5 octaves or more. I doubt that the four oscillators could ever 
> be tuned to a real common pitch as it would be required for unisono or 
> polyphonic use.
> 
> Florian
>

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.