For those who's grain is gone against with the idea of a digitally based delay: Keep an open mind! I mean this with the greatest respect - please don't read any email anger here, there is none. My whole point being however for some things, a digital heart is far superior for both sonic and control possibilities - reverb, delay and flanging among them. Not to mention envelope generators and other complex CV generators. If anyone doubts the quality of, let's say, a digital reverb - have listen to TC Electronics' 6000 - it's utterly amazing. Of course, it's $12,000 USD for a single unit! But there are other far less expensive alternatives for incorporating micro p's and DSPs (OK, i said it) in analog applicaitons. Imagine a polyphonic oscillator which would respond to both MIDI AND analog VC. Or a 5.1 panner, or a trigger/voltage to midi converter which would allow not only full control of any midi instrument, but would enable a user to record events on a midi sequencer such as Cubase. WIth digital, the possibilities are endless! -- In Doepfer_a100@y..., Stinchcombe Timothy <tstinchcombe@q...> wrote: > Hi Florian (again!) > > > > I bet you ONLY reason Doepfer has not produced an analog VC > > > delay is the main part needed to do so, the bucket brigade chip, > > > is now obsolete and in very short supply worldwide. > > This is basically true. But a BBD delay would not be the only > > available > > technology. > > Again, what other technologies are you thinking of here? A digital delay probably goes against the grain with some people, so the only other thing I can think of off the top of my head would be a tape loop!? > > Tim > > [The views expressed above are entirely those of the writer and do not represent the views, policy or understanding of any other person or official body. Personal email. This email is personal. It is not authorised or sent on behalf of the sender's employer. This email is the personal responsibility of the sender.] > > > > The Information contained in this E-Mail and any subsequent correspondence > is private and is intended solely for the intended recipient(s). > For those other than the recipient any disclosure, copying, distribution, > or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on such information > is prohibited and may be unlawful.
Message
Re: Request for Advi ce
2002-08-16 by petergrenader
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.