Hi Paul, Thanks for the info. I have just simulated the 'attack' part of the circuitry in the demo versions of PSpice and Multisim that I'm currently evaluating. Admittedly neither has the exact models for the BC547/549 (they are demo versions after all...), but using two NPN transistors whose parameters looked reasonably different, you wouldn't have got a fag paper between the two 'envelopes' output! This confirms my initial reaction - the differences in the transistors probably don't affect the output that much (which is why the two types are considered equivalent). I'd still wager any difference comes down to the capacitors - I've been wanting to get to the bottom of this for other reasons (the quad osc in the frequency shifter for one) but have only recently received a book with some info that may help, and it's also partly the reason I am evaluating the analogue simulation packages, so that I can model different effects and see what happens. This is some way off yet, so I'm about all out of steam on this for now! If I do have any other ideas I'll of course post them. Tim --- In Doepfer_a100@y..., Paul Schulz <dasfonk@w...> wrote: > I noticed some differences in transistors of my ADSRs, too. Okay, here > we go (components marked on the PCB in brackets) > > A-140 with the flat LED: Q1 to Q4 and Q6: 547 (549); Q5: 557 (559) > A-140 with round LED: Q1and Q2: 549 (549); Q3, Q4 and Q6: 548 (549); > Q5: 557 (559) > > Paul (confused)
Message
Re: A-140 differences (was:Flat LEDS)
2002-10-03 by Tim Stinchcombe
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.