Doepfer

I dunno why you wouldn't just use a VCO if you wanted a VC clock 
source with variable and VC pulse width. Am I missing something? Other 
than the PWM, it would be the same as clocking the A155 with the VC 
LFO, which is difficult to sync to midi. 

I still prefer the idea of the VC divider on the clock input side, and 
a VC gate time function on the output side, but maybe someone else has 
a better idea. Maybe the A154 could have a clock input instead of a 
clock rate control voltage, driving the clock output which has PWM.

--- In Doepfer_a100@y..., bakis Sirros <synth_freak_2000@y...> wrote:
> he list,
> updated link:
> http://www.doepfer.de/a154.htm
> 
> 
> also,there is a mistake in the text:
> the lenght of the a155 gate out doesn't change as the
> clock pulse width changes.ONLY,the lenght of the three
> a155 trigger outs is exactly the same as the duty
> cycle of the clock pulse.so,the pwm of the clock
> source will ,only ,affect these outputs.
> bakis.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> =====
> synthfreak(parallel worlds)
> athens-greece
> [Doepfer_a100] group owner-moderator
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> U2 on LAUNCH - Exclusive greatest hits videos
> http://launch.yahoo.com/u2