Doepfer

hi ringmod45,
the pot for the clock cv is simply for attenuation of
the clock speed cv input...just as the cv pot of the
a147....
bakis.



--- ringmod45 <ringmod45@yahoo.com> wrote:
> --- In Doepfer_a100@y..., "Joe Buechler"
> <buechlerjoe@t...> wrote:
> > I dunno why you wouldn't just use a VCO if you
> wanted a VC clock 
> > source with variable and VC pulse width. Am I
> missing something? 
> Other 
> > than the PWM, it would be the same as clocking the
> A155 with the VC 
> > LFO, which is difficult to sync to midi. 
> 
> i think the best method to clock the A155 from midi,
> would be to use 
> the A190 instead of the A147. this would provide a
> tighter clock. the 
> only function it does is provide a steady pulse for
> the A155 clock 
> input.
> 
> remember the A147 is a resettable lfo and it is
> constantly looking a 
> reset trigger. this could produce anomalies as a
> clock source if you 
> are syncing to midi. i think the A147 is better used
> for controlling 
> voltages to sync to note intervals or measures. i.e.
> syncing a filter 
> sweep to a specific note lenght or bar measure. also
> you could a 
> keyboard voltage to play the A147 to trigger the
> A155 clock.
> 
> 
> 
> > 
> > I still prefer the idea of the VC divider on the
> clock input side, 
> and 
> 
> you could place the A160/161 right beside the A154
> to sastify 
> function.
> 
> 
> > a VC gate time function on the output side,
> 
> you could use the A155 bottom row cv out to control
> the pulse width 
> cv in of the A154. not sure if this could work, but
> highly probable.
> 
>  but maybe someone else has 
> > a better idea. Maybe the A154 could have a clock
> input instead of a 
> > clock rate control voltage, driving the clock
> output which has PWM.
> 
>  i believe the clock cv in is specifically for that,
> what i find 
> confusing is having a cv pot on the clock cv in.
> could this behave as 
> a divisor for the input? Dieter? Bakis? Anyone?
> 
> Regards,
> RM
> 
> > 
> > --- In Doepfer_a100@y..., bakis Sirros
> <synth_freak_2000@y...> 
> wrote:
> > > he list,
> > > updated link:
> > > http://www.doepfer.de/a154.htm
> > > 
> > > 
> > > also,there is a mistake in the text:
> > > the lenght of the a155 gate out doesn't change
> as the
> > > clock pulse width changes.ONLY,the lenght of the
> three
> > > a155 trigger outs is exactly the same as the
> duty
> > > cycle of the clock pulse.so,the pwm of the clock
> > > source will ,only ,affect these outputs.
> > > bakis.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > =====
> > > synthfreak(parallel worlds)
> > > athens-greece
> > > [Doepfer_a100] group owner-moderator
> > > 
> > >
> __________________________________________________
> > > Do you Yahoo!?
> > > U2 on LAUNCH - Exclusive greatest hits videos
> > > http://launch.yahoo.com/u2
> 
> 


=====
synthfreak(parallel worlds)
athens-greece
[Doepfer_a100] group owner-moderator

__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
U2 on LAUNCH - Exclusive greatest hits videos
http://launch.yahoo.com/u2