I’d certainly buy on of those :) > On 23 Jul 2015, at 12:47, yahoo@doepfer.de [Doepfer_a100] <Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com> wrote: > >> Yes, but the circuit design would be mostly complete, tested, and proven. By "other manufacturers", I really meant "an >> enthusiast with the passion to keep the sub-system alive", not a team of circuit designers with an established system for >> fabrication and their own idea of what features are necessary. I'm not an engineer, but I can design a PCB, source all >> the components, and build kits. I've just had a small batch of PCBs fabricated for a project I'm doing, so I wake up >> with a bit of confidence that anything is possible. Zöe and Nina might consider taking on this project also and would >> have more experience than I in producing a professional-grade result (front panel). >> >> >> The DIY community can support legacy projects, there just isn't always the capital to invest in bulk purchases to cut >> costs. If I were to attempt this, it would not be to profit financially, it would simply be to keep the system >> available as an option for future modular users and to provide those "missing pieces" to folks who didn't purchase the >> complete system from you (voiced/unvoiced, slew control, etc). >> >> Nick > > To speak the truth I'd not recommend to copy the A-129 modules as they are. As already mentioned by you more modern VCAs (SSM2164) > instead of the obsolete and expensive Curtis VCAs CEM3381 should be used. And it would be also a good idea to use a better type of > VC slew limiter (not the controller/slew limiter combo with pulsewidth controlled VC switches and lowpass filters). After all it > would be a redesign. Only the filter stages could remain unchanged. Maybe we could collect orders. If 50 orders are reached we may > think about a new more compact vocoder, i.e. an all-in-one unit with analysis section, slew limiter, synthesis section. Each channel > linked via jumpers between analysis section/slew limiter input and slew limiter output/synthesis section so that it can expanded to > a fully modular version if desired by replacing the jumpers by output/input sockets. But I don't want to promise anything as we > still have a lot of projects to be finished. > > Best wishes > Dieter Doepfer > > > > ------------------------------------ > > ------------------------------------ > > > ------------------------------------ > > Yahoo Groups Links > > >
Message
Re: [Doepfer_a100] Vocoder
2015-07-23 by Neil Kagan
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.