Hey guys, thanks for the support (I wish I could get some support from Chris at Doepfer!) I really love the 'idea' of the schaltwerk, which is why I am spending the time to rewrite the OS... it's a fun challenge :) If you haven't already, you should also check out the futureretro mobius (www.future-retro.com). It is only one track, but it has most of the features the schaltwerk is missing. From what I have seen in the Schaltwerk code, it is not really a matter of processor power to add the features we have been requesting... since most of them are not timing critical, the only thing that may affect timing is checking each step for a note tie. There is some room left to add additional code, so hopefully I can squeeze everything in without having to remove any features I will post more when I have information. cheers ripe --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "ringmod45 <ringmod45@y...>" <ringmod45@y...> wrote: > - > > Hi Andreas, > > good to see that your back. I hope all is well. yeah the schaltwerk > is still boxed and sitting idle. I don't feel like dumping it for .20 > cents on the dollar. until the mini schaltwerk business came up. I > was waiting for Ripe101 to finish his revision of the code before > giving up on it. if his OS is what it should have been in the first > place, I will hang on. if the new doepfer is better , i will > entertain that as well. Right now my support is 150% behind Ripe101. > I wish i knew more about coding so I could help out.Hey Ripe Take it > to the Bridge. I will be there for him when he needs users to beta > test his OS and give him a financial hand for effort. >
Message
Re: A short observation about the "WERKS"
2003-02-04 by ripe101 <ripe909@hotmail.com>
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.