Yahoo Groups archive

Doepfer

Index last updated: 2026-04-29 00:15 UTC

Message

Re: A short observation about the "WERKS"

2003-02-04 by ripe101 <ripe909@hotmail.com>

Hey guys, thanks for the support (I wish I could get some support 
from Chris at Doepfer!)

I really love the 'idea' of the schaltwerk, which is why I am 
spending the time to rewrite the OS...  it's a fun challenge :)

If you haven't already, you should also check out the futureretro 
mobius (www.future-retro.com).  It is only one track, but it has 
most of the features the schaltwerk is missing.

From what I have seen in the Schaltwerk code, it is not really a 
matter of processor power to add the features we have been 
requesting... since most of them are not timing critical, the only 
thing that may affect timing is checking each step for a note tie. 
There is some room left to add additional code, so hopefully I can 
squeeze everything in without having to remove any features

I will post more when I have information.

cheers
ripe

--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "ringmod45 <ringmod45@y...>" 
<ringmod45@y...> wrote:
> -
> 
> Hi Andreas, 
> 
> good to see that your back. I hope all is well. yeah the 
schaltwerk 
> is still boxed and sitting idle. I don't feel like dumping it 
for .20 
> cents on the dollar. until the mini schaltwerk business came up. I 
> was waiting for Ripe101 to finish his revision of the code before 
> giving up on it. if his OS is what it should have been in the 
first 
> place, I will hang on. if the new doepfer is better , i will 
> entertain that as well. Right now my support is 150% behind 
Ripe101. 
> I wish i knew more about coding so I could help out.Hey Ripe Take 
it 
> to the Bridge. I will be there for him when he needs users to beta 
> test his OS and give him a financial hand for effort.
>

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.