Doepfer

I've been doing that, as well as using an inverter.  But really, I'd 
rather just have an offset module.

Regards,
Kevin

--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "pstnotpd" <psm@w...> wrote:
> So why don't you run a +5 and the original signal through a linear 
> 138? That should do the trick, though it wouldn't save much space 
or 
> money I suppose..... But then again, mixers are always usefull.
> 
> --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "code_pig" <code_pig@y...> 
wrote:
> > Actually, I just wanted a dual offset module because I really 
don't 
> > need (or have room for) and A129/3.  
> > 
> > I mean, I don't want to whine, but I really don't think it should 
> be 
> > necessary for one to purchase the A129/3 (which really can't be 
> fully 
> > expolited without the A129/4 Controller) when all one may need is 
a 
> > couple of offset generators.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Kevin
> > 
> > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "jmaddocks1975" 
> > <jmaddocks1975@y...> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > I agree, this is something I am looking at building.
> > > My a129 never gets used and I really want a fixed filter, so if 
I 
> > can 
> > > make a module with 15 pots to control the a129/2 I got one.
> > > Any ideas of best way to make it?
> > > 
> > > John
> > > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "pstnotpd" <psm@w...> 
wrote:
> > > > Wouldn't that be fairly easy to make yourself? A number of 
pots 
> > 15 
> > > > running from the internal power. Something like a CV source+ 
so 
> > > that 
> > > > the 129 could be used as a filter bank, but much cheaper an 
> space 
> > > > consuming. 
> > > > Or am I getting you wrong?
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "code_pig" 
<code_pig@y...> 
> > > wrote:
> > > > > This might have already been discussed, but...
> > > > > 
> > > > > I know the A129/3 does offsets, but might there be room for 
> > > > something 
> > > > > like a simple dual offset generator module?
> > > > > 
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > Kevin