hi ingo, i don't know about this. i only know what's mentioned in the a101-3 page. bakis. --- selfoscillate <synaptic_music@yahoo.com> wrote: > > hello bakis, > > i know that 10 jacks won't be ommited just for a > lower price, > i just wrote that the microprocessor solution would > be more > expensive. all least i don't care about the price, > i'll buy > this module anyway, but i would prefer the patchable > version :-) > > in my opinion the 12 feedback points would be enough > for > esoteric patching and i can't think about a special > application > for 12 inputs. two inputs should be fine, as long as > we have feeback points and outputs for each stage. > > another thing, will this phaser incorporate voltage > control > of resonance? maybe independent vc resonance for > stages 1-6 > and 7-12? would be a shocking feature for stereo use > :-) > > best wishes > > ingo > > > > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, Bakis Sirros > <synth_freak_2000@y...> wrote: > > hi ingo, > > doepfer aren't omitting the audio inputs for 10 of > the > > 12 stages in order to reduce the price of the > > module,but,because they can't think of any usable > > application for those 10 extra audio > inputs.(remember, > > EACH ONE of the 12 stages WILL have a feedback > input > > AND an audio output!only audio inputs for 10 > stages > > ,except stages 1 and 7 ,are ommited.)if anyone can > > think of a usable application for those 10 extra > audio > > inputs,let doepfer know. > > bakis. > > > > > > > > --- selfoscillate <synaptic_music@y...> wrote: > > > > > > hello list, > > > > > > i've seen the latest additional ideas on the > > > provisional > > > a101-3 page and i would prefer a patchable > version > > > without > > > the microprocessor. it would not only make it > less > > > expensive, > > > it would also make it a more versatile module > (in my > > > opinion). > > > > > > the 2 separate phaseshift controls and mix > outputs > > > are a good > > > idea, even better than on the moogerfooger > 12stage > > > phaser. > > > > > > inputs for stages 1 and 7 only would also be ok > for > > > me. > > > as we all know, more inputs are better, but i > > > wouldn't > > > mind if it only got these 2 inputs instead of > 12. > > > this module will have enough jacks anyway and > those > > > feedback > > > inputs will serve us well enough for sure :-) > > > > > > three polarizers are also a very good idea. > > > > > > geee, looks like another must-have monster > module. > > > awesome awesome awesome > > > > > > best wishes > > > > > > ingo > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, > > > "synth_freak_2000" > > > <synth_freak_2000@y...> wrote: > > > > hi list, > > > > where are all the members?a new amazing > modular > > > phaser(with > > > vactrols) > > > > is on the way with some really unique features > and > > > no reaction??? > > > any > > > > comments,or suggestions?this will be the best > > > modular vocoder out > > > > there!(no other phaser module has all these > > > capabilities). > > > > bakis. > > > > > > > > [doepfer_a100]group owner > > > > > > > > > > > > ===== > > Bakis Sirros > > Parallel Worlds / Polariton > > Athens-Greece > > [Doepfer_a100] group owner > > http://www.rubber.gr > > http://www.ward12.com > > > > __________________________________ > > Do you Yahoo!? > > The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product > search > > http://shopping.yahoo.com > > ===== Bakis Sirros Parallel Worlds / Polariton Athens-Greece [Doepfer_a100] group owner http://www.rubber.gr http://www.ward12.com __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search http://shopping.yahoo.com
Message
Re: [Doepfer_a100] Re: about the awesome A101-3( 12 stage) vactrol modular phaser!!!
2003-10-23 by Bakis Sirros
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.