Yahoo Groups archive

Doepfer

Index last updated: 2026-04-29 00:15 UTC

Message

Re: about the awesome A101-3( 12 stage) vactrol modular phaser!!!

2003-10-27 by ps_minor

mdimm, 

take a look at SYNapse at www.analoguesolutions.com, might be what you're 
looking for.

-psm



--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, mdimm <mdimmm@h...> wrote:
> 
> my current fantasy module would be a voltage controllable patch matrix,
> 12x12 or larger, strictly for routing signals, but with a preset save
> option.
> a number of modules could have their in- and outputs connected to the
> matrix's in- and outputs, and connections could be made internally without
> the need for patch cords being moved (i know, it might sound blasphemous 
to
> some). it would be really interesting when one could save the matrix
> settings and recall them, instantly changing complex patches. "scrolling"
> through these presets could be vc controlled.
> so the module might have 12 inputs and 12 outputs (or 16, 24, ...) for
> signals and one or more cv inputs.
> ideally the architecture would be so that using more than one made sense.
> 
> i don't know how hard to design and manufacture this would be... anyone 
with
> a better understanding of how these things work?
> 
> mdimm
> 
> > Message: 11
> >  Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 06:14:03 -0700 (PDT)
> >  From: Bakis Sirros <synth_freak_2000@y...>
> > Subject: Re: Re: about the awesome A101-3( 12 stage) vactrol modular 
phaser!!!
> > 
> > hello psm,
> > the microprocessor will control a 12x12 matrix.this
> > matrix will contain the 12 feedback inputs and the 12
> > audio outputs of the 12 stages of the phaser.
> > advantages:one could store presets of the various
> > matrix settings.but,the big disadvantage:no patching
> > sockets(that means no 24 minijack sockets for the
> > feedback inputs and outputs of the module).so,
> > patchable version is best!after all,the a101-3 will be
> > a modular 12 stage phaser,right?
> > bakis.

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.