Doepfer

Whatever goes into making the mysterious quality refered to as bottom-
end, I don't think the A-111s are particularly more notable for it 
than the A-110s are.  I consider the A-111s more reedy and precise 
than my Analogue Systems RS-90s, which I find to have a much rounder 
and Moogier quality and I'd choose if I were looking for a rounder 
type of bass.  Of course with the A-120 and RS-100 filters, you're 
dealing with Moog ladders whose character is going to be different 
from an SH101 filter regardless.  I much prefer the RS-100 to the A-
120, actually.


--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "nectarios01" <nectariosm@h...> 
wrote:
> It is not the lack of character I am talking about, but the lack of 
> the bottom end that the A-100 has compared to the Sh-101.
> 
> Using the 24dB/8ve transistor ladder filters on my system (A-120, 
RS 
> 100), I find that I have to shelf 100Hz by +3dB on the Joemeek 
> VC1Qcs EQ before I get the same bootom end (in level, not as tight) 
> as the Sh-101.
> Does the A-111 output substantialy more bottom end that the A-110? 
> I am going to get a couple anyway since the A-111 waveforms are a 
> bit different to the A-110's (and for the extra features), but I'd 
> just like to know what to expect in the bottom end region.
> 
> 
> Peace out.