--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, Bakis Sirros <synth_freak_2000@y...> wrote: > > --- Dieter Doepfer <hardware@d...> wrote: > > From: "Dieter Doepfer" <hardware@d...> > > To: "Bakis Sirros" <synth_freak_2000@y...> > > Subject: Please forward ... > > Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 12:58:53 +0100 > > > > > to be honest, the a133 polarizer made me a bit > > disappointed. > > > it didn't worked like i thought it would, but > > maybe i have a > > > flawed one. so i don't want to describe the a133 > > further, > > > before doepfer had the chance to explain the > > behaviour of my > > > polarizer module. i'll post the results as soon as > > possible. > > > > What's wrong with the module ? > > > > The LEDs display show the preset amplification: > > > > Both off = ~ no amplification > > right LED maximum = amplification +5 (attention: not > > +1) > > left LED maximum = amplification -5, i.e. 5 inverted > > (attention: not -1) > > > > If desired the amplification can be restricted to > > -1....+1 (one resistor has > > to be replaced). hmm no, my module doesn't react this way. giving +1v into the module, i get a -0,45v output and the leds are off. normally i should get +1v, when all the leds are off, right? best wishes ingo
Message
Re: Fwd:doepfer's answer about ingo's a133 vc polarizer.
2003-11-27 by selfoscillate
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.