Yahoo Groups archive

Doepfer

Index last updated: 2026-04-29 00:15 UTC

Message

Re: Fwd:doepfer's answer about ingo's a133 vc polarizer.

2003-11-27 by selfoscillate

--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, Bakis Sirros 
<synth_freak_2000@y...> wrote:
> 
> --- Dieter Doepfer <hardware@d...> wrote:
> > From: "Dieter Doepfer" <hardware@d...>
> > To: "Bakis Sirros" <synth_freak_2000@y...>
> > Subject: Please forward ...
> > Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 12:58:53 +0100
> > 
> > > to be honest, the a133 polarizer made me a bit
> > disappointed.
> > > it didn't worked like i thought it would, but
> > maybe i have a
> > > flawed one. so i don't want to describe the a133
> > further,
> > > before doepfer had the chance to explain the
> > behaviour of my
> > > polarizer module. i'll post the results as soon as
> > possible.
> > 
> > What's wrong with the module ?
> > 
> > The LEDs display show the preset amplification:
> > 
> > Both off = ~ no amplification
> > right LED maximum = amplification +5 (attention: not
> > +1)
> > left LED maximum = amplification -5, i.e. 5 inverted
> > (attention: not -1)
> > 
> > If desired the amplification can be restricted to
> > -1....+1 (one resistor has
> > to be replaced).

hmm no, my module doesn't react this way.
giving +1v into the module, i get a -0,45v output and
the leds are off. normally i should get +1v, when all the leds
are off, right?

best wishes

ingo

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.