I am new to Doepfer, and I am seeking more info on the build quality from all the experienced users here. My first excursion will be a MAQ16, but I have heard that the quality of these devices is poor: legends rub off, MIDI loses sync, the rotary encoder wears out quickly. Admittedly, this opinion comes from only one or two websites in the UK, so there may be some unmentioned bias happening in the background from these sources. Nonetheless, I would greatly appreciate anyone's comments about the overall quality of Doepfer instruments, the MAQ in particular. Would anyone suggest the blue LED version? Would it be more reliable? (blue LEDs draw less current, as I understand it, so less taxing on power supply...maybe) There are two other "MAQ" Yahoo groups, but there is no activity there and few members and many SPAM porn posts. I looked into SoftStep, but this is a completely different beast and although similar to the MAQ, lacks some of it's features (but adds lots more for algorithmic composition) SoftStep can't replace the MAQ, IMHO. I don't really need bells and whistles, just a basic SQ-10-like box to get me started in modular synthesis control. I have some old modular CV stuff, but would like to go towards all- Doepfer eventually. Again, anyone's comments would be greatly appreciated. I mean, if these products are well made, this should be made known! If the quality is not-so-hot, this should be stated, too. Thanks to all!! (and sorry for the newbie 'tude) ja
Message
Doepfer Quality Concerns
2003-12-23 by jauer9
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.