Yahoo Groups archive

Doepfer

Index last updated: 2026-04-29 00:15 UTC

Message

Doepfer Quality Concerns

2003-12-23 by jauer9

I am new to Doepfer, and I am seeking more info on the build quality 
from all the experienced users here. 

My first excursion will be a MAQ16, but I have heard that the quality 
of these devices is poor: legends rub off, MIDI loses sync, the 
rotary encoder wears out quickly. Admittedly, this opinion comes from 
only one or two websites in the UK, so there may be some unmentioned 
bias happening in the background from these sources.

Nonetheless, I would greatly appreciate anyone's comments about the 
overall quality of Doepfer instruments, the MAQ in particular.

Would anyone suggest the blue LED version? Would it be more reliable? 
(blue LEDs draw less current, as I understand it, so less taxing on 
power supply...maybe)

There are two other "MAQ" Yahoo groups, but there is no activity 
there and few members and many SPAM porn posts.

I looked into SoftStep, but this is a completely different beast and 
although similar to the MAQ, lacks some of it's features (but adds 
lots more for algorithmic composition) SoftStep can't replace the 
MAQ, IMHO.

I don't really need bells and whistles, just a basic SQ-10-like box 
to get me started in modular synthesis control.

I have some old modular CV stuff, but would like to go towards all-
Doepfer eventually.

Again, anyone's comments would be greatly appreciated. I mean, if 
these products are well made, this should be made known! If the 
quality is not-so-hot, this should be stated, too.

Thanks to all!!

(and sorry for the newbie 'tude)

ja

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.