> How does the moogerfooger mf104 compare to the blacet? the moogerfooger sounds a bit more dull, because of strong output filtering, but it has some nice gimmicks, like the feedback i/p point. it also sounds great at high resonance settings, parts in the circuit seem to limit the output signal, so it never gets too nasty, even with very hot input signals. the moogerfooger sounds very warm and smooth. the blacet sounds more open, more high frequencies are passed to the output. there are also some nice gimmicks in the blacet, like a built-in envelope follower. the resonance can have negative amounts, which is great for flanging effects, but the blacet is a bit more complicated to use, you have to be careful with your adjustments, especially resonance. as far as i know, both use the same bbd chip (mn3005). if i had to choose between the two, i would choose the blacet, but thats all a matter of taste and the moogerfooger is sold out anyway. best wishes ingo
Message
Re: Delays
2004-01-05 by selfoscillate
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.