Doepfer

--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, Bakis Sirros 
<synth_freak_2000@y...> wrote:
> 
> --- Dieter Doepfer <hardware@d...> wrote:
> > From: "Dieter Doepfer" <hardware@d...>
> > To: "Bakis Sirros" <synth_freak_2000@y...>
> > Subject: AW: Fwd: AW: [Doepfer_a100] Why not syncing
> > A-143-4 with MIDI clock?(doepfer's answer)
> > Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 15:03:17 +0100
> > 
> > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > > Von: selfoscillate
> > [mailto:synaptic_music@y...]
> > > Gesendet: Dienstag, 3. Februar 2004 09:10
> > > An: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
> > > Betreff: Re: Fwd: AW: [Doepfer_a100] Why not
> > syncing A-143-4 with MIDI
> > > clock?(doepfer's answer)
> > >
> > > hopefully the a143-4 will incorporate phase
> > control of
> > > the waveforms, should be no problem then.
> > 
> > Right. But which approach is better: independend
> > reset inputs or analog
> > phase controls (manual + CV) for each sub-LFO. Both
> > are not possible at the
> > same time as a reset will of course influence the
> > phase too.
> > 
> > Best wishes
> > Dieter Doepfer

i'd prefer analog phase control instead of reset inputs,
best with manual control and cv-inputs with attenuator,
but i don't know if the module gets too big or expensive then.

best wishes

ingo