> > > Is it possible for the signal(on the same note) to change after a > few > > > hours of continuos work? > > Of course. This is normal for every synthesizers VCO with this > schematic > > (eg. Moog Rogue). > > Are you saying the A110 is based on the moog rogue oscillator? This view has been expressed here before, but looking at the schematics I would say there are more differences than similarities. For example, the exponential converter in the Rogue is quite different to that in the A-110, presumably bringing differences in temperature stability with it. The A-110 uses the 'transistor oven' method to make it temperature-stable; the Rogue seems to be using a voltage generated by one transistor in the chip as a reference used by the transistors driving each oscillator, and also that for the filter cut-off. How stable this makes it I do not know, I have not attempted to check the detail, nor how similar this is to the A-110 stability. However from the schematics, it's clear the two methods are quite different. But, whatever: designing a highly-stable analogue oscillator is quite tricky, and unless you spend an inordinate amount of time, effort and money on it, the chances are the oscillators are likely to drift over many hours of continual use. The trick is really to keep this within a level such that it is seen as 'acceptable', rather than a pain-in- the-butt to have to keep re-tuning. Tim
Message
Re: A-110 Standart VCO
2004-03-08 by Tim Stinchcombe
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.