Doepfer

Pierre,

Both Ingo and Julian have the right idea.  Look in the photo section 
(on the left) for a file called VCA_Example_1.jpg (it should be the 
last one up there).  It shows a basic patch using a VCA to govern the 
level of the LFO, which in turn modulates the pitch of the VCO.

Regards,
Kevin


--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "Pierre Zeeman" <pierrezee@h...> 
wrote:
> Kevin,
> 
> As a VCA = end of the line man, I was very interested in this 
statement of 
> yours:
> 
> >I, for one, use a number of VCA's because I view them as more than
> >simple gain controls, or the final module in a patch.  To me, VCA's
> >are basic automation devices, and when used to control modulator
> >outputs (for both for level and time), VCA's can animate a patch.
> 
> Perhaps I am misunderstanding you here, but it seems to me you are 
talking 
> about using the VCA as a stage to pass a modulator through on the 
way to the 
> carrier.  You would then apply automation to the VCA (via seq, env, 
lfo, 
> whatever) which would in turn modulate the signal passing through 
the VCA 
> and, hence, ultimately the carrier itself.  While this would be 
very useful 
> for a carrier which has a CV input for modulation but no modulation 
amount 
> knob, surely it's just wasting a VCA where the CV input on the 
carrier does 
> allow depth to be set as well?
> 
> The reason I ask is because I have always suspected that I am 
lacking 
> something fundamental in my approach to the use of VCAs...
> 
> TIA
> 
> Pierre
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> Take MSN wherever you surf - download MSN Toolbar! 
> http://toolbar.msn.co.za?DI=1054&XAPID=2185