Doepfer

I agree.  I'm grateful it doesn't sound like a Moog.  I love the Moog
sound, but I love the Doepfer sound too.  The AS VCOs have a fatter
sound to my ears, but I generally find myself prefering the slight
astringency of the A111s for my purposes.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: mritenburg [mailto:mritenburg@yahoo.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2004 2:07 PM
> To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Doepfer_a100] 110 vs 111 (was Re: tuning
> Hi Gino,
> 
> I believe the A110 is perceived as "richer" sounding as the waveforms 
> are not as pure as the A111.  The sine is a shaped triangle, the 
> square wave is a little droopy, etc.  This, of course, results is 
> more harmonics.  Also, the A110 is a true discrete design whereas the 
> A111 uses the CEM chip.  IMHO, this discrete design has the A110 
> sounding something like an Emu modular oscillator, whereas, the A111 
> sounds very similar to my oberheim matrix 6 oscillators.  I think the 
> biggest let down for some people when it comes to Doepfer modules is 
> the lack of "moogieness."  Some people go looking for that "moog" 
> sound in Doepfer and are let down.  I was looking for something 
> different and have been pleasantly surprised along the way.
> 
> I hope that helps,
> 
> Matthew