Yahoo Groups archive

Doepfer

Index last updated: 2026-04-29 00:15 UTC

Message

110 vs 111 (was Re: tuning)

2004-06-11 by ethanzer0

--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, Bakis Sirros 
<synth_freak_2000@y...> wrote:
> exactly!
> because,if every synth manufacturer ,after the
> minimoog appeared, was trying to copy the moog sound,
> all synths would sound the same,and we would never had
> oberheim,arp,synton,ems,roland,korg and many other
> synths with their own great sound,as we have now.
> bakis.


Sure.  If everyone just followed the partyline and nodded their heads 
in sycophantic approval without asking for new features and pointing 
out when something actually sounds bad when it sounds bad, we would 
end up with uniform blandness.  Instead, we have a wealth of 
impressive modules to chose from.  I for one am glad that we can 
openly say something needs improving or additonal functionality 
without being flammed or told we are wrong.  I am also very impressed 
by Dieter's willingness and desire to provide the tools musicians 
want.  The Doepfer stable of modules is one of the most impressive 
out there right now.  Now, if we could just work on distribution and 
delivery. (as I sit, tapping my foot waiting for new modules I 
ordered in April) ;-)

E_o

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.